Analisis Nilai Tambah Dan Tingkat Efisiensi Usaha Agroindustri (Ubi Kayu) Di Saree Kecamatan Lembah Seulawah Kabupaten Aceh Besar
Abstract
Cassava commodity is an important and very strategic food crop commodity because it can be used for a variety of products including food, feed, energy, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Various processed products from cassava include snacks / chips, tape, chicken feet, mocaff, liquid sugar, bio-ethanol fuel, medicinal base ingredients, cosmetics industry mix, plant growth stimulants, environmentally friendly plastic stirofoarm, and various products others. Research Objectives a) To find out the magnitude of the benefits and the level of efficiency in processing cassava into tape, chicken paw yam and balado chips b) To determine the magnitude of added value in processing cassava into tape, chicken paw cassava and balado chips. This research was conducted in Saree, Lembah Seulawah sub-district, Aceh Besar District. by purposive sampling. The object of research is the agro-industry business group with the commodity of tape, chicken-claw sweet potato and balado chips. The sampling technique is "simple random sampling" the sample size is 25% of the population (28 people) craftsmen. Data collection is done through primary data and secondary data. Calculation of added value using the Hayami method, et al. (1987). The results showed that the profit earned per month by each type of processed cassava into cassava tape was Rp. 2,634,539 (28.38%), chicken paw cassava Rp. 3,859,532 (25.35%) and balado chips Rp 5,011,250 (29.00%), the amount of added value generated by each type of processed cassava tape is Rp. 3,994,539 (43.03%), chicken paw cassava Rp. 5,339,532 (35.07), and balado chips Rp. 6,511,250 (37.60). R / C ratio value of processing cassava into cassava, chicken paws and balado chips, the three types of preparations obtained R / C ≥ 1, meaning that the three types of processing business are feasible and efficient. The highest value of R / C ratio of processed type is balado chips, which is 1.41, which in economic terms says that each cost incurred in processing business of 1 rupiah will receive revenue of 1.41 rupiah.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Hasan, 2014. Marketing dan Kasus-Kasus Pilihan. CAPS. Yogyakarta.
Astawan, M dan Mita W. 1991. Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan Nabati Tepat Guna. Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta.
Arselo, 2012. Pengantar Agroindustri dalam Pertanian. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta.
Boediono. B. 2013. Seri Sinopsis Pengantar Ilmu Ekonomi No. 1 Ekonomi Mikro Edisi Kedua, Cetakan kedua puluh delapan, BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Feriady. 2013. Metode Analisis Pertanian, Universitas Andalas, Sumatra Barat, Padang.
Gandjar, I., 2003. Tape from cassava and cereals. The First International Symposium and Workshop on Sight into the World of Indigenous.
Hayami Y, Kawagoe T, Morooka Y, Siregar M. 1987.Agricultural Marketing andProcessing in Upland Java. A Perspective from a Sunda Village. Bogor: TheCPGRT Centre.
Herawati, H., 2006. Potensi ubi kayu (Manihot esculenta Crantz) sebagai pangan pokok untuk mendukung program ketahanan pangan. Prosiding Seminar Optimasi Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Pertanian, melalui Akselerasi Pemasyarakatan Inovasi Teknologi Berbasis Pertanian, Bandung.
Hidayat, 2006. Mikrobiologi Industri, C.V Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Mubyarto, 1995. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. LP3ES, Jakarta..
Rukmana, R., dan Yuniarsih, Y., 2001. Aneka Olahan Ubi Kayu. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Saragih, B. 2001. Membangun Sistem Agribisnis. Yayasan USESE bekerja sama dengan Sucofindo, Bogor..
Simbolon, Karlina. 2008. Pengaruh Persentase Ragi Tape Dan Lama Fermentasi Terhadap Mutu Tape Ubi Jalar. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian USU, Sumatera Utara.
Soekartawi, 1993. Agribisnis Teori dan Aplikasinya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
_________, 2006. Agribisnis Teori dan Aplikasi. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
Sudiyono, 2010. Metode Analisis Nilai Tambah Pada Usahatani. Universitas Medan Area, Medan.
Sudiyono A. 2002. Pemasaran Pertanian. Yogyakarta : UMM Press.
Susanto. T., dan Saneto. B. 1994. Teknologi pengolahan hasil pertanian. Bina ilmu, Surabaya.
Sugioyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta, Bandung
Valentina, Oxy. 2009. Analisis Nilai Tambah Ubi Kayu sebagai Bahan Baku Keripik Singkong di Kabupaten Karanganyar (Kasus pada KUB Wanita Tani Makmur). Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Wachisbu, D. R., 2008. Analisis Usaha Tape Singkong Di Kecamatan Wringin dan Kecamatan Binakal, Kabupaten Bondowoso, Provinsi Jawa Timur. Skripsi. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Wargiono, J., A. Hasanuddin, dan Suyamto. 2006. Teknologi Produksi Ubi Kayu Mendukung Industri Biothanol. Puslitbangtan, Bogor, Halaman 12
Yanti, H.F, 2013. Analisis Perbandingan Nilai Tambah Pengolahan Ubi Kayu menjadi Tepung Mocaf dan Tepung Tapioka di Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai. Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.